|
![]() |
![]() |
|
There
is nothing new about fibre testing, the first real attempt to introduce
electronics in this area began back in 1953. The use of objective
measurements may have been viewed with suspicion when it was initially
introduced but it has brought the wool industry into line not only
with other natural fibres, but more importantly with the processors
and manufacturers.
With the introduction of new technology in the form
of the ODFA 2000 and its predecessor ODFA 100, technically supported
by SGS, each trait with an economic value can now be measured. It
can then be used either on its own or with any one or a number of
other factors to improve breeding management and keep up with market
requirements.
Today on farm testing offered by Pastoral Measurements
Ltd. and the OFDA 2000 is now able to give quick and reliable results
over a wide range of factors. The important traits that can be objectively
measured from a small greasy sample include: mean fibre diameter,
standard deviation, coefficient of variation, comfort factor, CEM,
curvature, fibre distribution, SD along, bulk and staple length.
All of these traits play an important part in the
end product and make up the parameters now being demanded by processors.
But they can not be subjectively assessed accurately, if at all.
For example; this has been clearly demonstrated by the cause of
the 'prickle factor' or comfort factor, as it is now known, and
not desired in apparel products. The awareness of the percentage
of fibres greater than 30 microns identified by testing has enabled
the benefits of producing a softer product by the elimination such
fibres.
|
Two
important traits influencing economic value, given everything else
is equal, are micron and style. While style is not objectively assessed,
criteria that make up style differences such as SD, CV, curve and
bulk can be. To demonstrate the effect on economic value the data
from two clips who have used fibre measurement in the management of
their clip has been analyised.
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Stonehenge
is farmed by Jim & Sue Hore and their youngest son Andrew at
Patearoa situated in the Maniototo. Here they run a large commercial
flock consisting of 6000 ewes run in conjunction with a Stud, breeding
Merino and Halfbred Rams.
![]()
![]()
The Stonehenge clip is known for its stylish, long, white, soft
handling wool. Over a number of years the clip had developed a harsh
edge but the source was not able to be accurately pin pointed. The
aim was to get rid of the stronger edge and more importantly the
stock with the undesirable traits.
While the wool from the Stud stock is been tested
annually it wasn't until 2000 that the entire commercial ewe flock
was put through the ODFA 2000. This was undertaken for four main
reasons:
- In an effort to improve the commercial flock
by eliminating an undesirable trait and
- To lower the average micron.
- On farm testing was now possible and affordable,
and enabled
- The entire commercial flock to be tested in an
quick and efficient manner. Results were available on the spot
saving time and repeated handling.
Fibre testing conducted by Pastoral Measurements
Ltd. confirmed there was a portion of the clip in the 21-micron
bracket and identified characteristics that could not be accurately
assessed subjectively. The resulting data meant a benchmark could
be set for a number of factors: fibre diameter, CV, SD, CF and CEM,
and in conjunction with visual selection culling could be carried
out in a uniform manner. Identification of the individual-offending
animals was made and the appropriate action could be made immediately.
|
|

Fig 1: The ewe fleece micron range from 1998
when the edge (CEM) became apparent, and after the remedial action
taken in 2000. Source Sue & Jim Hore.
|
|
The
fibre testing in conjunction with a progressive breeding program
has resulted in the narrowing of micron range of the clip whilst
maintaining all the other characteristics that Stonehenge wool is
renowned for.
In the 10 years prior to the testing of the commercial
flock the bulk of the ewe clip fell into the 20-micron bracket.
By 2002 the average had been shifted to 18 microns, and the stronger
end of the clip is no longer present.
In the hogget clip a similar situation has
occurred. After averaging in the 18's for many years the average
made a significant shift from 17.7 microns in 2000 to 17.2 in 2002.
|
|

Fig 2: The hogget clip showing the shift in micron.
The 18.5+ micron sheep identified in 2000 were culled. Source: Sue
& Jim Hore
|
|
By
applying average auction clean fleece prices from 2002/03 to the
2000 and 2002 ewe and hogget clip data financial gains can be shown.
For example: Say best top making/spinners style F1
style fleece makes up 50% of the clean weight of an average ewe
fleece - 3kg and a hogget -2.5kg
In 2000 the averaged ewe F1 style fleece return per
head is calculated to be $21.78 compared to that in 2002 of $51.
A comparable result is achieved in the hoggets with
an average of $31.98 per head in 2002, up from $23.72 in 2000.
This quite clearly illustrates a notable financial
gain simply by lowering the average micron.
|
|

Fig 3: Style F1price trend history. Source: MNZ
& MWI
|
|
At
Stonehenge the use of the test data in conjunction with visual appraisal
has greatly assisted in developing the breeding program. Using the
ODFA 2000 a desired result in lowering the average micron could
be achieved more quickly, within just two seasons in fact, than
if it had been done just purely using visual assessment and the
introduction of new genetics. As well the undesirable trait had
been removed. By 2002 the stronger end of the micron range had been
completely eliminated.
In addition the average length has increased with
less weight in secondary lines and there have been greater returns
for the finer micron.
Style and length have not been issue as the
majority of the Stonehenge clip has fitted into the best top making/spinner
style categories for many years.
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Although
style was not an issue for the Stonehenge clip it has certainly
played a major part in the development of the Curraghmore clip.
When Peter and Pam Higgins purchased the property, which is located
on the Haldon Rd in the McKenzie country, 14 years ago after many
years as a heavy machinery contractor, they took over the existing
polled merino stock.
They began a fibre-testing
program in 1998 primarily because the average /good top making style
20-21 micron wool which formed the base of their clip at the time
returning an average of $5, was not economically sustainable.
Because of the size of the property increasing stock
numbers was never an option. There was no need to buy in stock as
in addition to the sweet dry hill country the breeding stock did
not have any health issues and had had a good fertility base over
the past 14 years, with lambing percentages ranging from the lowest
of 103% to a high of 130%. They decided then to breed their way
to a finer and improved style of wool clip.
The Higgins's felt they could begin to get better
genetics at an earlier stage, after being advised by Donald Burnett
to "always breed from young stock" and began with fibre
testing the 2th ewes and rams using the Pastoral Measurement mobile
laboratory. The result of this testing showed there was a range
of 14 to 25 microns in the flock.
In the following year Pastoral Measurements Ltd.
tested all ewes with the OFDA 100 prior to shearing. Their woolclasser
was also invited to partake in the clip upgrading program by commenting
on any poorer style and off line fleeces. As all sheep are number
tagged and each fleece identified by this number it was a simple
matter to cull the animal.
(NOTE: Classing should
never be carried on micron results alone. Other basic factors such
as style, evenness of length and staple strength are equally as
important.)
Since 2000 every sheep is tested using the OFDA 2000
at shearing time.
With the decision to change their flock they
felt they could get a better selection to decrease the micron base
by continuing with basically Merryville bloodlines but changing
to horned rams.
|
|
The
initial aim was to fine the ewe clip from 20 micron to 18 micron.
Consequently the data on micron, CV and CF were the criteria first
used for selection and culling decisions.
Now as more information is available and Peter
and Pam have a better understanding of the other data available
about their clip from the fibre testing also use it where applicable
to enhance the style.
|
|

Fig 4: The Curraghmore ewe clip showing the rate
of change. (Source Pam & Peter Higgins.)
|
|
Goals
over the past 5-years with regard to style and micron have been
readily achieved. Most lines have improved to a spinner type, and
the average micron has been substantially reduced to 18 microns.
In 1995 there was no ewe wool finer than 19 micron. By 2002 only
a very small percentage of the clip was stronger than 19.5.
Recognising the need not just to solely chase the
micron, sheep size and constitution were also taken into account.
Progress in these areas hasn't been quite so immediate as "we
keep shifting the goal posts as we go along" explained Peter.
Fleece weights have also been part of the equation
and these have been largely maintained, the average greasy weight
dropping from 5kg to just 4.7 kgs.
How has all this added value to the clip you
might ask. As is illustrated in Fig 5 improving only the style of
20+ micron wool would have little if any financial benefit. The
only real option was a shift to a finer micron to increase returns.
Even greater gains have been be made by also improving the style.
There are significant price differentials once the micron falls
below 18 microns.
|
|

Fig 5: Style versus price. Source; MWI and MNZ
|
|
An excellent example of a significant financial benefit
is illustrated in the returns of the hogget clip. In 1998 the top
line of 18.2 realised just $6.02c /kg, and in 2002 the 15.5micron
line topped the sale selling for $35/kg greasy.
For the Higgins, coming from a non-farming background
fibre testing and the data presented has been a dramatic learning
curve for them. Not only have they learnt about their own clip and
watched its progress but about merinos in general.
The main gains have been:
- The better understanding of their merino clip,
merinos and the growing of merino wool.
- Using this information they have improved the
genetics of their flock,
- made huge inroads into the improvement of their
clips style
- lowered the average micron and
- tightened the range of the micron spread. Important
for a smaller sized clip.
- The greatest gain has been in achieving
all of the above they have made a marginal operation into a more
promising business venture.
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Traditionally over
the past ten years there has been a price differential, in general
an increase in price as the micron decreases. This trend is not
likely to change in the foreseeable future.
At different times there has been appreciable
cut off points with regard to price at certain microns in the market
and the and in some instances at points of a micron.
It is possible by identifying just one trait
such as fibre diameter with very little effort and cost to change
the emphasis of your clip into a higher return bracket almost immediately.
During the very first year of testing in the
case of the Curraghmore clip, the identification of a bale of wool
under 16 microns, just one single factor of the test results, paid
for the testing. In addition there is a permanent record for each
individual animal and over time a number of identified characteristics
have helped in the overall improvement of the flock and clip.
At a time when
end user clients demand narrower parameters on not just the micron
there is a need for the grower to have as much information on their
clip as possible in order to maximise returns.
To keep a tight reign on the future direction of the Stonehenge
clip, to maintain flock micron and to assist with adjustments that
may be deemed necessary regarding other characteristics, the fibre
testing program will be continued indefinelty with the ewe hoggets
and 2ths.
Fibre testing will also play a part of Peter
and Pam Higgins's long term farming management plan towards a finer
and better styled clip.
Data is as valuable
as you want to make it. Pastoral Measurements Ltd. has developed
a comprehensive program for ranking and setting breeding strategies.
This also has the potential for in shed classing by grouping fleece
by predetermined parameters.
While it is difficult to put a $ value on it
as each individual grower is unique, the proceeding examples are
genuine.
If you are in any doubt what so ever ask yourself
if you can afford not to spend time on acquiring knowledge about
your clip to improve your financial viability and position.
|
![]() |
![]() |
|